{"id":193741,"date":"1987-06-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-12T16:40:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=193741"},"modified":"2019-03-12T16:40:35","modified_gmt":"2019-03-12T16:40:35","slug":"auto-insert-193741","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-193741\/","title":{"rendered":"Fourth 黑料专区 North American Regional NGO Symposium on the Question of Palestine (New York, 24-26 June 1987) – Report – DPR publication"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
<\/p>\n
ON THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 黑料专区 Headquarters, New York<\/p><\/div>\n 24-26 June 1987<\/p><\/div>\n \n <\/p>\n INTRODUCTION<\/p><\/div>\n The Fourth 黑料专区 North American Regional NGO Symposium on the Question of Palestine was convened at 黑料专区 Headquarters in New York from 24 to 26 June 1987 in pursuance of General Assembly resolution 40\/96 B of 12 December 1985. The theme of the meeting was "The inalienable rights of the Palestinian people".<\/p><\/div>\n The symposium was attended by 74 NGOs, 29 of them as observers.<\/p><\/div>\n The meeting received a message from Mr. Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) (see annex II).<\/p><\/div>\n H.E. Mr. Alberto Velezco-San Jose, speaking on behalf of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, opened the Symposium. In his statement, he pointed out the evolution of responsible involvement of NGOs in the work of the 黑料专区, in particular the North American Co-ordinating Committee for NGOs on the Question of Palestine (NACC). The Third International NGO Meeting, he continued, had called for the observance of 1987 as the fortieth anniversary of the adoption of General Assembly resolution 181 (II), in addition to marking 20 years of Israeli military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Petition campaigns based upon the theme of the observance were addressed to the Governments of the United States of America and Canada. He stressed the efforts made by the NGOs to help build a consensus for the convening of the International Peace Conference on the Middle East in accordance with General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C of 13 December 1983.<\/p><\/div>\n In her introductory statement, Ms. Ethel Born, chairman of NACC, described the large number of activities carried out since 1986 by NACC, with special attention to the urgency of ending 20 years of occupation and the support to designate 1987 as the Year of the Palestinian People. The most significant accomplishment of NACC had been the publication of a newsletter which, through its distribution to individuals and organizations, had contributed to the expansion of the committee's constituency. NACC needs a broad-based support system so that it will not be seen as an instrument of any particular organization or organizations.<\/p><\/div>\n One panel discussion, entitled "The need for convening the International Peace Conference on the Middle East in accordance with 黑料专区 resolution 38\/58 C: the urgency of ending twenty years of occupation", was established with the following panellists presenting their papers:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Mr. Tawfiq Abu Ghazaleh (Gaza Centre for Rights and Law))<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Mr. Latif Dori (Committee for Israeli-Palestinian Dialogue);<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Rev. Benjamin Weir (Presbyterian Church, USA).<\/p><\/div>\n Eight workshops were set up to debate the following topics:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Media\/public relations)<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Challenges in defending human and civil rights)<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Coalition-building)<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Grassroots organizing;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>Women;<\/p><\/div>\n (f)\t<\/span>Peace and anti-intervention;<\/p><\/div>\n (g)\t<\/span>Religion and relief groups;<\/p><\/div>\n (h)\t<\/span>Third world communities.<\/p><\/div>\n The Symposium unanimously adopted a final declaration which is attached as annex I to the present paper.<\/p><\/div>\n PANEL DISCUSSION<\/p><\/div>\n "The need for convening the International Peace Conference <\/u>on the<\/p><\/div>\n Middle East in accordance with 黑料专区 resolution 38\/58 C: <\/u><\/p><\/div>\n The urgency of ending twenty years of occupation"<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Mr. Tawfiq Abu Ghazaleh, Attorney with the Gaza Centre for Rights and Law, in his statement, stressed the importance of the exercise of the right of return for the Palestinian refugees in accordance with the 黑料专区 Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Since Israel declared the right to return to every Jew in the world, the Palestinians must practise the same right, focusing it on the Partition Plan. Furthermore, he said, all peoples have the right to self-determination so peoples who have not achieved self-determination have the same right to it as those who exercised it previously. Under occupation there can be no protection of dignity of the human being. For the Palestinians living under the Israeli-declared "iron fist" policy, this means daily humiliations, collective punishment, deportation, administrative detention, imprisonment and all kinds of coercion, discrimination and degradation.<\/p><\/div>\n In his view the enforcement of the 黑料专区 system of legal order will free Palestinians as well as Israelis from all kinds of violence unless the International Peace Conference on the Middle East that will provide the basis for peace and justice is convened.<\/p><\/div>\n Mr. Latif Dori, founder and Secretary of the Committee for Israeli- Palestinian Dialogue, was of the view that the great military victory of the Six-Day War had become the greatest disaster of the State of Israel, since instead of exploiting that victory in order to achieve a peace agreement, Israel's leaders had preferred to continue holding on to the territories. He summarized the events of the last 120 years as follows:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Most nations of the world had condemned Israel and severed diplomatic relations with her;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>World public opinion had shifted its sympathies from Israel to the Palestinians;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>The United States had showed its imperialist face by supporting Israeli policies and opposing a peace solution that included representatives of the PLO, the representative of the Palestinian people;<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, socialist countries and some Western European nations had remained steadfast and unwavering in their struggle for an agreed solution to peace through the convening of the proposed International Peace Conference;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>The PLO had gathered great public support and had become the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people;<\/p><\/div>\n (f)\t<\/span>Oppressive measures enforced by Israeli authorities could not subdue the struggle of the Palestinian people;<\/p><\/div>\n (g)\t<\/span>The settlement policy had severely damaged the Israeli economy;<\/p><\/div>\n (h)\t<\/span>Right-wing forces had brought about a major political revolution by coming into power in 1977;<\/p><\/div>\n (i)\t<\/span>Israeli leaders had missed historic opportunities to reach peace by not recognizing the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people and returning the occupied territories, as they did with Egypt;<\/p><\/div>\n (j)\t<\/span>The withdrawal from Lebanon had been mainly due to the pressure exerted by Israeli public opinion;<\/p><\/div>\n (k)\t<\/span>The occupation endangered the peace achieved with Egypt;<\/p><\/div>\n (1) Opposition to an international conference existed within both blocs in the Israeli Government, the difference being only tactical.<\/p><\/div>\n He indicated that after 20 years of occupation Israel faces the choice of either becoming another South Africa or of reaching a just peace with its neighbours. The Israeli-Palestinian Committee had organized a series of activities during the month of June-to end the occupation. Two other organizations of Oriental Jews, the East for Peace Movement and the Eastern Front, maintained a high level of co-operation and were active on the peace front in Israel. He pointed out the change in Israeli public opinion in recent years concerning the participation of the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people in negotiations for peace. In 1970 only 14 per cent had supported this idea, whereas nowadays the number had reached 36 per cent. As regards the November 1986 historic meeting of an Israeli peace delegation with the PLO delegation in Romania and a second recent meeting held in Hungary two weeks previous, he explained that they demonstrated that the Palestinian side was extending its hand in peace while the current Government of Israel was rejecting that hand and refusing to sit together with the PLO. But no force in the world could prevent the continuation of this dialogue. In this line, he appreciated the resolution of the Palestine National Council in Algeria about "developing relations with the Israeli democratic forces".<\/p><\/div>\n Rev. Benjamin Weir, of the Presbyterian Church (USA), discussing the effects over the past 30 years of the unresolved issue of the Palestinian need for a homeland and independence, noted that the cost was too great to allow the situation to continue festering any longer.<\/p><\/div>\n As regards the cost in terms of human lives, he recounted his personal experiences in the siege of the Tellaz Zaatar camp in Lebanon in 1976, as well as the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982. In relation to the cost in terms of the human spirit, he explained how the Israeli military authorities were determined to prevent Palestinian leadership from developing and becoming effective. Expulsion of political and intellectual leaders through the years had become systematic, and the closure by the occupation authorities of Palestinian universities as well as other institutions had become common practice. The cost in terms of time should also be taken into serious consideration, as opportunities fostering Palestinian self-determination and freedom had passed by. In commenting on his experience with Shiite Muslim extremists when he was <\/i>kidnapped in May 1984, he pointed out that though he neither accepted their methods nor agreed with their interpretation or objectives he could easily understand their passion for justice since they had been reacting angrily to the 1982 Israeli invasion which had disastrously swept over south Lebanon and its predominantly Shiite population. In his view, the present must be seized since there was still a measure of hope.<\/p><\/div>\n The Presbyterian Church (USA) had held a conference in San Francisco two months previous, which was attended by a large number of representatives from across the United States. The Conference reviewed a series of resolutions that had been adopted by the General Assembly in 1984. One of them focused on "the foundation for a just peace in the Middle East" as enunciated in 1974 and acknowledged and supported the role of "the 黑料专区 as the prime instrument for bringing about peace in the Middle East". Participants in the conference supported the need for an international peace conference dealing with the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people and its need for self-determination, including its choice of representatives for such a conference. In his closing statement, an appeal was made for progress towards an international peace conference on the Middle East.<\/p><\/div>\n In his closing statement, H.E. Mr. Alberto Velizco-San Jose underscored the importance of the testimony that- the Symposium had heard from experts from the Occupied Territories and Israel since, in his opinion, their views lifted the participants beyond thinking of Palestine not just as a question but also as it is lived by those who deal with the situation on a daily basis.<\/p><\/div>\n Annex I<\/p><\/div>\n DECLARATION AND WORKSHOP RECOMMENDATIONS<\/p><\/div>\n ADOPTED BY THE NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL<\/p><\/div>\n NGO SYMPOSIUM ON THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 1.\t<\/span>We, the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) participating in the Fourth 黑料专区 North American Regional NGO Symposium on the Question of Palestine, wish to thank the 黑料专区 Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People for making this meeting possible. We are indeed honoured by the presence of the members and observers of this distinguished 黑料专区 body.<\/p><\/div>\n 2.\t<\/span>We wish also to thank the Chief of the Division for Palestinian Rights, the NGO liaison officers, the staff of the Division and the Department of Conference Services for their invaluable assistance in the preparation and execution of this meeting.<\/p><\/div>\n 3.\t<\/span>We wish also to voice our appreciation to the distinguished expert panelists, workshop organizers, resource persons and facilitators who offered their invaluable insights into the question of Palestine and the potential central role to be played by NGOs in North America. The practical suggestions and strategies developed in the workshops assisted us in formulating future collaborative efforts in North America and in linking our efforts to a broader global network.<\/p><\/div>\n 4.\t<\/span>We believe this meeting contributed to the constructive interaction between the 黑料专区 and the North American NGO community concerned with the non-implementation of General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C of 13 December 1983, a resolution whose implementation we hold to be indispensable in securing a just and durable solution to the question of Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n 5.\t<\/span>We call upon the peoples and Governments of the United States of America and Canada to take all possible steps to secure the implementation of General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C, in order to secure a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Arab-Israeli conflict, the core of which is the question of Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n 6.\t<\/span>We resolutely reaffirm the international consensus that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) is the sole and legitimate representative of the Palestinian People. We affirm the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination without external interference and to establish an independent Palestinian State on its own national territory under the leadership of the PLO and the right of return, in conformity with all relevant 黑料专区 resolutions.<\/p><\/div>\n 7.\t<\/span>We further strongly support the convening of the International Peace Conference on the Middle East as called for at the International Conference on the Question of Palestine, August-September 1983, and as adopted by the General Assembly in resolution 38\/58 C. We applaud the continuing efforts of the Secretary-General to establish a preparatory committee for the Conference. It is essential that the International Peace Conference be inclusive and be attended by representatives of both Israel and the PLO, those Arab States party to the conflict, the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. We are encouraged by the declaration of the European Community of February 1987 and the declaration of the Nordic countries of March 1987 and hope that they will lead to initiatives which will result in the convening of the Conference.<\/p><\/div>\n 8.\t<\/span>Within our larger concern for equal rights and justice for all people, we reaffirm that our focus as participants in this symposium is the Palestinian people and its struggle to achieve its inalienable rights) and that our goal and responsibility is to support this struggle through the strategies and activities proposed in our workshops.<\/p><\/div>\n 9.\t<\/span>As NGOs, we have the unique opportunity to contribute to this struggle without governmental constraints. Our guidelines must come from our consciences, which are informed by history, the knowledge of current events, and respect for international law.<\/p><\/div>\n 10.\t<\/span>Events in the territories occupied in 1967 must be seen as part of both an historical pattern and a continuum. The history of the Palestinian community living in pre-1967 Israel is instructive in two respects. The first is Israel's systematic attempt at removing the people from their land) the second is the Palestinian people's unyielding determination, which has empowered them to succeed in remaining on their land.<\/p><\/div>\n 11.\t<\/span>The Palestinians of 1948 have taught us the importance of "samed" (steadfastness). As NGOs, we must therefore be committed to support concurrently both the struggle of the Palestinians of the 1967 occupation to remain on the land and the struggle -of the entire Palestinian people to attain self-determination.<\/p><\/div>\n 12.\t<\/span>NGOs in Canadian and United States society take special note of their role as representatives of an important segment of public opinion on the Palestine question. NGOs constitute an unquenchable force to be reckoned with that derives from this public consciousness. In view of this special role and status, non-governmental organizations in North America also recognize as part of their responsibility that they go beyond the self-imposed limitations of States and governments to contribute positively to the speedy restoration of national rights to the victimized Palestinian people.<\/p><\/div>\n 13.\t<\/span>The non-governmental organizations here convened recognize with appreciation the contributions that States Members of the 黑料专区 have made to the provision of standards of world order through the promulgation of international law. Humanitarian and human rights statutes constitute the legal basis for the self-determination of peoples, including the Palestinian people. In particular, such legal instruments as the 黑料专区 Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the 黑料专区 and other international covenants and conventions guarantee this right for the Palestinian people.<\/p><\/div>\n 14.\t<\/span>The international community had already affirmed the right of the Palestinian Arab people to their State in Palestine as early as 1947 with the "Plan for Partition with Economic Union". The denial of that right over the ensuing 40 years, and particularly throughout the 20 years of Israel's occupation by force of the West Bank and Gaza districts of Palestine, dramatize the failure of the international community of States to uphold the standards that they themselves have set forth. We as non-governmental organizations in North America call upon our respective Governments to respect and implement the inalienable rights of Palestinians as a people and nation, in accordance with international law.<\/p><\/div>\n 15.\t<\/span>In our constant attention to the issue of Palestine, the North American NGOs cannot confront this conflict in isolation from the considerations held in other parts of the world as well.<\/p><\/div>\n 16.\t<\/span>As people of conscience, we cannot conduct activities in our own countries in isolation from the world consensus and expect to contribute to a positive future.<\/p><\/div>\n 17.\t<\/span>The NGOs in North America affirm their commitment to co-operate in good faith with the international peace community – in the Americas, Europe, Israel, in the non-aligned countries and elsewhere – in their efforts towards the restoration of Palestinian rights, both for its own sake and in conjunction with efforts to reduce the continuing violence and risk of war in the Middle East.<\/p><\/div>\n 18.\t<\/span>Among the suggestions emanating from the discussion groups that merit serious attention and endorsement was that of convening an NGO-sponsored conference in North America (with the site of preference Washington, the alternate, Ottawa) bringing together representatives of the PLO and Israeli notables, and repeating the opportunity offered by the Constanta and Budapest meetings. Representatives of interested Governments, particularly from the European Community, the USSR and North America would also be invited.<\/p><\/div>\n 19.\t<\/span>We also recommend that the International Co-ordinating Committee on the Question of Palestine (ICC), in co-operation with the North American Co-ordinating Committee on the Question of Palestine (NACC), convene a model International Peace Conference utilizing NGO representatives from Israel, the PLO, the five permanent members of the Security Council and the Arab parties to the conflict. It should be held in New York under 黑料专区 auspices in conformity with General Assembly resolutions 38\/58 C and 40\/43 D. We further urge that this proposal be adopted by the NGOs participating in the Fourth 黑料专区 International NGO Meeting on the Question of Palestine in Geneva, 7-9 September 1987. The other small group discussion recommendations are annexed to the present paper.<\/p><\/div>\n 20.\t<\/span>The symposium supports the Israeli citizens, both Jews and Arabs, who are peace activists and who are in danger of going to prison as a result of their struggle to bring peace and security to their people and their nation.<\/p><\/div>\n 21.\t<\/span>The symposium condemns Israeli Government attempts to limit the activities of Israeli peace activists by promulgating anti-democratic laws such as the "Law for Prevention of Terrorism".<\/p><\/div>\n 22.\t<\/span>In the light of the above, the symposium requests that Israel re-examine the law and its negative influence and abrogate this law. In addition, the symposium calls on Israel to drop all charges against the peace activists.<\/p><\/div>\n 23.\t<\/span>The aim of the present meeting was to develop practical objectives and strategies to be implemented by North American NGOs in this the Year of the Palestinian People. Our primary work was conducted in workshops, and we affirm their conclusions as we have amended them below.<\/p><\/div>\n 24.\t<\/span>The Media\/Public Relations Workshop made the following recommendations:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>NACC, in close co-operation with North American NGOs, will undertake the development of a standardized guide on how to deal with the media and an annotated experts list representing the various sectors of North American society.<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>The experts will be selected for their ability to work effectively with the electronic and print media. The guide and list will be made available to NGOs co-operating with NACC.<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>The workshop repeatedly voiced a concern for humanizing the North American public's perception of the Palestinian people. To change minds, the participants concluded that it is necessary to develop effective techniques. NGOs shall focus on issues of high value to their targeted audiences, the moderate public of the United States and Canada. They should provide new information in concise form to media sources. Finally, in conformity with the suggested experts list, NGOs should offer credible spokespersons to the media and the public to comment on the issues.<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Awareness of Palestinian culture is one method to humanize perceptions of Palestinians. We therefore urge the North American NGOs:<\/p><\/div>\n (i)\t<\/span>To co-operate closely with ICC tours of Palestinian women and artists through North America in the fall of 1987 and at other times as one way of introducing North Americans to Palestinian people, their culture and their concerns;<\/p><\/div>\n (ii)\t<\/span>To target mainstream civic and social organizations in North America (i.e. Rotary, Kiwanis, Lions, Soroptimists) in order to schedule sympathetic speakers on the Middle East conflict, the role of the United States and the question of Palestine;<\/p><\/div>\n (iii)\t<\/span>To request the 黑料专区 to establish a permanent display of Palestinian cultural heritage to join the existing display on Palestinian political history currently on the third floor of the 黑料专区 General Assembly building;<\/p><\/div>\n (iv)\t<\/span>To create a mobile exhibit on Palestinian culture and history to be displayed throughout North America, which could be used in conjunction with programmes in local churches, libraries and universities.<\/p><\/div>\n 25. The Challenges in Defending Civil and Human Rights Workshop reaffirms the Third North American NGO Declaration of June 1986 and:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Calls upon Israel to observe the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) concerning the treatment of the Palestinian population in the occupied territories;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Condemns the use of any "alleged" legal system as a tool of foreign policy and as an instrument of repression of the Palestinian people;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Affirms the right of the Palestinian people to resist the Israeli occupation;<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Affirms the rights of free speech and political association both in the occupied territories, in Israel and in the United States, particularly during the two hundredth anniversary of the Constitution of the United States;<\/p><\/div>\n (e)\t<\/span>Opposes the Dole and Kemp bills and all related legislation and pledges collective action to defeat these bills;<\/p><\/div>\n (f)\t<\/span>Calls for legislation in support of the International Peace Conference on the Middle East as proposed by 黑料专区 General Assembly resolution 38\/58 C;<\/p><\/div>\n (g)\t<\/span>Supports Palestinian family reunification in the occupied territories, the "Los Angeles Eight" <\/p><\/div>\n 26 defendants case and other similar cases in the coming year;<\/p><\/div>\n (h)\t<\/span>Reaffirms the NGO theme\/campaign to end the 20 years of occupation;<\/p><\/div>\n (i)\t<\/span>Salutes all those Israelis who work for Palestinian human and civil rights.<\/p><\/div>\n 26. The Coalition-Building Workshop recommended the development of a broad-based coalition in North America drawing in participants from new constituencies such as third world groups; religious communities; labour unions; and peace, anti-intervention and women's groups. Its work shall be aimed at redirecting United States Middle East policy by:<\/p><\/div>\n (a)\t<\/span>Influencing public opinion, particularly in the United States, in support of the Palestinian people in its right of self-determination, including the right of return, and in support of an international peace conference to include the PLO, Israel, the five permanent members of the Security Council and the Arab States who are parties to the conflict;<\/p><\/div>\n (b)\t<\/span>Ending the Israeli occupation of Palestinian and other Arab territories;<\/p><\/div>\n (c)\t<\/span>Addressing human rights violations;<\/p><\/div>\n (d)\t<\/span>Creating a forum for debate of Middle East issues in the 1988 United States presidential campaign, to result in planks in major party platforms covering United States support for Palestinian self-determination and United States recognition of the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people and support for an international peace conference.<\/p><\/div>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n