\n
11.\t<\/span>At its 227th meeting, on 19 February 1997, the Committee re-elected Mr. Ibra Deguène Ka (Senegal) as Chairman, and re-elected Mr. Ravan A. G. Farhadi (Afghanistan) and<\/p><\/div>\n\n
Mr. Bruno Eduardo Rodríguez Parrilla (Cuba) as Vice-Chairmen.<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
12.\t<\/span>At its 228th meeting, on 14 April 1997, the Committee elected Mr. George Saliba (Malta) as Rapporteur.<\/p><\/div>\n\n
B. Re-establishment of the Working Group<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
13.\t<\/span>At its 227th meeting, on 19 February 1997, the Committee re-established its Working Group in order to assist in the preparation and expedition of the work of the Committee, on the understanding that any Committee member or observer could participate in its deliberations. 5<\/u>\/ The Working Group was constituted under the chairmanship of Mr. George Saliba (Malta) and Mr. Syed Akbaruddin (India) as Vice-Chairman. 6<\/u>\/ At the same meeting, the Committee adopted its programme of work for 1997. 7<\/u>\/<\/p><\/div>\n\n
IV. REVIEW OF THE SITUATION RELATING TO THE QUESTION<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
OF PALESTINE<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
14.\t<\/span>In accordance with its mandate, the Committee continued to keep under review the situation relating to the question of Palestine and to exert all efforts to promote the exercise by the Palestinian people of its inalienable rights.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
15.\t<\/span>The Committee also continued to monitor the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory, including Jerusalem, and the developments in the peace process on an ongoing basis through the media and the reports of 黑料专区 entities, as well as through the information provided by non-governmental organizations, individual experts and participants in meetings held under the auspices of the Committee.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
16.\t<\/span>The Committee followed closely the developments in the Middle East peace process. The Committee welcomed the signing by the parties on 15 January 1997 of the Protocol Concerning the Redeployment in Hebron and the Note for the Record outlining mutual undertakings by the two sides in implementation of the Protocol. The document set a timetable for the further redeployment of the Israeli troops. Over 80 per cent of the city was successfully transferred to the Palestinian Authority. In a statement issued on 20 January 1997, 8<\/u>\/ the Bureau of the Committee said it was encouraged by the signing of the Protocol. It expressed the hope that the Protocol would lead to the full implementation of the agreements already reached between the parties, in particular the commencement of substantive negotiations on matters pertaining to the permanent settlement. The Bureau reaffirmed its full support for the peace process and the realization by the Palestinian people of its inalienable rights, primarily the right to self-determination and statehood.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
17.\t<\/span>The Committee also welcomed the establishment, at the beginning of February, of eight bilateral Israeli-Palestinian subcommittees to tackle the outstanding issues during the transitional period, including the operation of the Gaza seaport and airport, safe passage corridors from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and the release of Palestinian prisoners.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
18.\t<\/span>The Committee welcomed the increasing contribution to the Middle East peace process by the various international parties. In that regard, it noted the increased involvement of the co-sponsors of the peace process, as well as the European Union, in efforts to bring about the resumption of the bilateral negotiations. The Committee was also appreciative of the resilient efforts with which a number of world leaders contributed to the task of restarting the peace process.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
19.\t<\/span>The Committee noted with extreme concern, however, that the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations faced serious setbacks during the year as a direct result of the position taken by the Government of Israel on the various elements of the peace process. This year again, the Committee observed the disturbing lack of respect by the Israeli side for the agreements already signed with the Palestinian counterparts. In the course of the year, numerous statements and actions on the ground by the Government of Israel created a situation in which the peace process could not successfully move forward. Throughout the year, the Israeli Prime Minister, members of the Government and other high-level officials made statements that negatively affected the sensitive issues to be discussed by the parties in the course of the permanent status negotiations. Especially worrisome were continued Israeli statements of intent with regard to the expansion of the existing Jewish settlements, the construction of new ones, and the building of roads to connect those settlements. The Committee considered those declarations not conducive to creating an atmosphere of trust and confidence between the parties and generally harmful to the peace process.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
20.\t<\/span>The Committee deplored the decision by the Government of Israel on 26 February 1997 to approve the construction of a new Jewish settlement at Jabal Abu Ghneim, south of East Jerusalem. In spite of the overwhelming expression of opposition to this decision by the international community (see paras. 34-55 below), construction of the settlement began on 18 March. On the same day, the Bureau of the Committee issued a statement 9<\/u>\/ deploring the beginning of the construction and voiced its concern at the negative implication of this decision for the future of the peace process. The Bureau also called for an end to the policies of military occupation, land confiscation and settlement, and for the resumption of the bilateral negotiations. In September, the Committee also expressed grave concern at efforts by militant settlers to establish a permanent presence in the Ras al-Amud district in occupied East Jerusalem.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
21.\t<\/span>In the year under review, the issue of Jewish settlements remained at the forefront of the Committee's attention. The Committee noted that the situation with respect to the construction and expansion of the settlements remained a serious concern. Statements made by representatives of the various branches of the Israeli Government and in the Knesset, indicated that a vigorous effort was under way to maintain and strengthen the Jewish settlers' presence in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. In the month of March alone, in addition to the start of construction at Jabal Abu Ghneim, several steps were taken by Israel to that end. The Ministry of Industry and Trade approved a US$ 30 million programme to encourage investment in a number of settlements, including four in the West Bank and one in the Gaza Strip. The Ministry of Defence approved the plan for the construction of 1,550 housing units in the settlement of Givat Zeev, north of Jerusalem. The Knesset Finance Committee approved a special allocation of US$ 16 million for the reinforcement of settlement in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. In April, a new policy of benefits to settlers, approved in late 1996, was finalized. Purchasers of apartments in 110 settlements throughout the West Bank and the Gaza Strip would receive additional mortgages and grant payments. Also in April, the Ministry of Construction and Housing launched a new advertisement campaign in Israeli newspapers offering government subsidies of up to tens of thousands of dollars to buyers of apartments in West Bank settlements. In May, Israel's Treasury announced the transfer of US$ 16.5 million into further development of Jewish settlements, as part of the Government's decision to grant favoured development status to those areas. The Ministry of National Infrastructures proposed that large tracts of Palestinian land in the West Bank containing water sources be annexed. Also, the construction of a new road network began in the West Bank to allow Jewish settlers to bypass Palestinian self-rule areas.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
22.\t<\/span>Demolition of Palestinian houses in the various parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip continued during the year. From January to early September, some 100 Palestinian houses were demolished in the occupied territory. The demolitions were carried out by the Israeli army, as well as by Jewish settlers. The Committee noted reports that the Jewish settler population has continued to grow. This led to numerous confrontations between armed settlers and Palestinians and resulted in casualties, including fatalities on the Palestinian side.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
23.\t<\/span>The Committee noted that, in February, 30 Palestinian women prisoners had been released by the Israeli authorities. The Committee emphasized that the release of the prisoners should have become an important confidence-building step between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Israel, however, continues to hold more than 3,600 Palestinian prisoners. Instances of the use of excessive force were recorded by the Palestinian Authority and various human rights organizations monitoring the situation on the ground. The Committee reaffirmed that the holding of prisoners in the territory of the occupying Power was a violation of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949 (the Fourth Geneva Convention), 10<\/u>\/ and called upon the Government of Israel to respect its obligations under the Convention. It also called upon Israel to release the prisoners, pursuant to the bilateral agreements.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
24.\t<\/span>The Committee followed with much concern the situation with regard to the issue of Palestinian residency rights in Jerusalem. It noted reports by Israeli and international human rights organizations of the illegal confiscation by the Israeli Ministry of the Interior of Jerusalem identification documents from Palestinian residents of Jerusalem. Apart from denying residency rights to the Palestinian residents of the city, this policy hampers their access to social services. The Committee is also of the view that the policy is aimed at creating a demographic reality in the city, which would pre-empt any just solution to the question of Jerusalem and would create an eventual imbalance in favour of the Israeli side in the course of the permanent status negotiations on the issue.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
25.\t<\/span>The Palestinian economy in the past year faced many of the same problems as in the previous years. The wide-scale international assistance effort notwithstanding, the economic situation in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip remained a matter of great concern to the Committee. The Palestinian economy continued to suffer from high unemployment, especially in the rural areas and amongst the young Palestinians.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
26.\t<\/span>During the past year, Israel continued arbitrarily to impose closures in response to its alleged security needs. According to a report prepared by the 黑料专区 Special Coordinator in the Occupied Territories, the Palestinian economy lost US$ 6 billion from 1992 to 1996, mostly owing to Israeli closures of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which prevented Palestinian workers from reaching jobs in Israel. The result of the closures has been a 36 per cent drop in per capita gross national product from US$ 2,700 in 1992 to US$ 1,700 in 1996.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
27.\t<\/span>According to a report of the World Bank issued in August, losses caused by the closure could amount to 40 to 60 per cent of income and output, or US$ 4 million to<\/p><\/div>\n\n
US$ 6 million a day. Some 51,000 Palestinians had been licensed to work in Israel each day until 30 July 1997. The closure resulted in a US$ 31.1 million loss in potential income, while restrictions on trade between Israel and the Palestinian territories cost another US$ 29.9 million.<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
28.\t<\/span>The Committee expressed grave concern at the imposition by the Israeli authorities of a blockade of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip following the suicide bombing incident in West Jerusalem, on 30 July 1997. The Bureau of the Committee unreservedly condemned all acts of violence against defenceless civilians. The Bureau, in a statement issued on 6 August 1997, 11<\/u>\/ also stated that harsh retaliatory measures on the part of the Israeli Government would dangerously exacerbate the state of the Palestinian economy and result in greater hardship and despair among the Palestinian population. A closure was reimposed by the Israeli authorities following another suicide incident in West Jerusalem on 4 September 1997. The Committee affirmed on a number of occasions its strong opposition to this policy, which suffocates the fledgling Palestinian economy, interferes with the implementation of assistance projects and the disbursement of international aid, brings hardship and suffering to Palestinian households and exacerbates tension in the region. The Committee also reiterated its position that the practice of closures was in direct contravention to the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
29.\t<\/span>In the period under review, the Committee expressed great appreciation for the continued efforts of the international community to provide the needed assistance to the Palestinian people through the Palestinian Authority, despite the growing difficulties on the ground. The Committee was of the view that the international assistance provided by the organizations of the 黑料专区 system, as well as that provided by the donor community, remained vital to the successful transition of the Palestinian people to national sovereignty and statehood. It welcomed the appointment in February of<\/p><\/div>\n\n
Mr. Chinmaya R. Gharekhan as the Special Coordinator in the Occupied Territories, to serve as a focal point for the 黑料专区 family of organizations and to maintain ongoing contact with the donor community, non-governmental organizations active in the field and others.<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
30.\t<\/span>The Committee noted the dedicated effort of the 黑料专区 Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), which continued to provide its much-needed services to the refugees and their families despite its difficult financial situation. The Committee noted with appreciation the provision by UNRWA of education, health and social services to some 3.4 million Palestinians and considered it a valuable contribution to the alleviation of poverty and the development of the human, social and economic potential of the Palestinian people. The Agency's programme of special hardship assistance, along with the social welfare programme of the Palestinian Authority Ministry of Social Affairs, constituted an important safety net for the Palestinian poor. The two programmes supported some 303,000 Palestinians. The Committee called for continued and intensified international support for the activities of UNRWA.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n